ABACHA’S WIFE DENIES IBB’S ALLEGATION

Maryam Abacha, widow of Nigeria’s former military leader, General Sani Abacha, has firmly denied allegations made by former President Ibrahim Babangida that her late husband was responsible for annulling the historic June 12, 1993 presidential election.

In an interview with TVC, Mrs. Abacha defended her husband’s legacy and dismissed Babangida’s recent claims as unfounded. “That annulment was not done by my husband,” she stated. “If it was him, then he must have been more powerful than the President himself.”

Her remarks follow comments from Babangida suggesting that Abacha played a pivotal role in the controversial annulment of the election believed to have been won by Chief Moshood Abiola.

Using a mix of irony and pointed criticism, Maryam Abacha questioned the logic of the former president’s claims. “If the President was there and someone else was making the decisions, then Abacha must have been the greatest,” she said, implying that such assertions undermined Babangida’s own authority at the time.

Babangida, who announced the annulment in a national broadcast on June 24, 1993, has recently sought to clarify his actions in interviews and his new autobiography. He claimed the situation spiraled out of control due to mounting internal pressures within the military and unexpected moves by then National Electoral Commission Chairman, Professor Humphrey Nwosu.

According to Babangida, Nwosu halted the release of election results without official approval—a decision that further complicated the already tense political climate. He also cited a controversial court order issued by Justice Saleh, which legally blocked the announcement of the election outcome.

Although Babangida admitted that annulment was considered among several possible responses to the electoral crisis, he suggested the final decision deviated from initial plans and was heavily influenced by factors beyond his control.

However, political analysts have questioned the timing of Babangida’s narrative. With General Abacha no longer alive to respond, critics argue that these revelations come too late and raise concerns about fairness and historical revisionism.

The June 12 election is widely remembered as one of Nigeria’s freest and fairest, and its annulment led to a prolonged period of national unrest. The renewed public debate between the Babangida and Abacha camps highlights the lingering struggle among Nigeria’s former military leaders to shape the story of the country’s democratic journey.