Our Reporter
The development has sparked concerns among party stakeholders, with many warning that sidelining a political heavyweight of Daniel’s stature could undermine the legitimacy of any consensus arrangement ahead of the 2027 elections.
Party insiders say the move contradicts the spirit and letter of the Electoral Act 2022, which mandates inclusiveness and voluntary agreement among all cleared aspirants in any consensus process.
Legal analysts note that without the written consent of every aspirant, as required by law, any claim of consensus remains defective and vulnerable to challenge.
This raises the possibility of internal resistance that could weaken the party’s cohesion in a politically sensitive region.
Further complicating matters is the legal requirement that where consensus fails, parties must revert to direct or indirect primaries.
Observers warn that any attempt to impose a candidate without broad-based agreement may not only deepen divisions but also expose the APC to litigation from aggrieved aspirants.
Such disputes, if escalated to the courts, could derail the party’s preparations and create openings for opposition forces.
With tensions already simmering, stakeholders are urging the APC leadership to retrace its steps and adopt a more transparent and inclusive approach.
The unfolding situation underscores a critical test for party unity in Ogun East, as the balance between political strategy and legal compliance becomes increasingly decisive ahead of the next electoral cycle.
